Keywords
Communal Intellectual Wealth
Legal Regulations
Traditional Cultural Expressions
Intellectual Property Rights
How to Cite
Abstract
This study examines the potential reformation of features representing traditional cultural expressions as communal intellectual wealth and the regulatory role of law in safeguarding and promoting this positive orientation. Employing normative legal methodology, existing legal frameworks are analyzed. The research reveals that the reformulation of features embodying traditional cultural expressions is pivotal in preserving their cultural continuity as shared intellectual assets. This process entails safeguarding cultural heritage through intellectual property rights, crafting guidelines, cultural education promotion, empowering local communities, preventing intellectual property abuse, international cooperation, and nurturing local creative industries. Legal regulations play a crucial role in protecting and advancing this positive reformation, encompassing Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) protection, registration and identification of traditional cultural elements, cultural policy formulation, community participation rights and consultation, law enforcement, international collaboration, and public education and awareness. These facets collaboratively ensure that traditional cultural heritage is respected, safeguarded, and judiciously utilized, allowing it to persist, evolve, and contribute positively to national identity and global intellectual wealth.
Highlight:
-
Preservation of Cultural Continuity: The study emphasizes the pivotal role of reformulating traditional cultural expressions in maintaining their cultural heritage's continuity as a shared intellectual asset.
-
Multi-Faceted Regulatory Approach: The research underscores the comprehensive legal measures, including Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) protection, cultural policy formulation, and community participation rights, aimed at safeguarding and promoting positive reformation.
-
Global Impact: By ensuring the respectful and judicious utilization of traditional cultural heritage, the study highlights its contribution not only to national identity but also to the broader realm of global intellectual wealth.
Keyword: Cultural Heritage Protection, Communal Intellectual Wealth, Legal Regulations, Traditional Cultural Expressions, Intellectual Property Rights.
References
I. B. Y. D. Putra and I. W. Wiryawan, “PENGUASAAN NEGARA ATAS EKSPRESI BUDAYA TRADISIONAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAK CIPTA DI INDONESIA,” J. Kertha Negara, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 305–315, 2021.
R. B. B. Perangin-angin, R. Nababan, and P. G. Siahaan, “Perlindungan Pengetahuan Tradisional sebagai Hak Konstitusional di Indonesia,” J. Konstitusi, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 178, May 2020, doi: 10.31078/jk1718.
B. Wedhitami and B. Santoso, “UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN EKSPRESI BUDAYA TRADISIONAL DENGAN PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN DAERAH,” LAW REFORM, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 32, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.14710/lr.v9i2.12444.
Z. Makkawaru, Perlindungan Hukum Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Upaya Pengelolaan Aset Kekayaan Intelektual Bangsa. Sukabumi: Farha Pustaka, 2019.
K. Roisah, “PERLINDUNGAN EKSPRESI BUDAYA TRADISIONAL DALAM SISTEM HUKUM KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL,” J. Masal. Huk., vol. 43, no. 3, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.43.3.2014.372-379.
S. Rongiyati, “Hak Kekayaan Intelektual atas Pengetahuan Tradisional,” J. Negara Huk. Membangun Huk. untuk Keadilan dan Kesejaht., pp. 213–238, 2011.
J. J. Sumanti, M. E. Kalalo, and R. Mamengko, “AKIBAT HUKUM PEMAKAIAN MEREK YANG MEMILIKI PERSAMAAN PADA POKOKNYA DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG MEREK DAN INDIKASI GEOGRAFIS,” Lex Priv., vol. 10, no. 2, 2022.
L. Diana and A. Tiaraputri, “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM WARISAN BUDAYA TAK BENDA DI KABUPATEN KAMPAR PROVINSI RIAU,” Procceding Call Pap. Natl. Conf. Law Stud. Pembang. Huk. Menuju Era Digit. Soc., no. 1284–1299, 2020.
A. F. Nisa, “IMPLEMENTASI KURIKULUM BERBASIS KEARIFAN LOKAL DI SD NEGERI JARAKAN PANGGUNGHARJO SEWON BANTUL,” J. Inspirasi Manaj. Pendidik., vol. 5, no. 1, 2017.
A. Atsar, “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENGETAHUAN DAN EKSPRESI BUDAYA TRADISIONAL UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KESEJAHTERAAN MASYARAKAT DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 5 TAHUN 2017 TENTANG PEMAJUAN KEBUDAYAAN DAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 28 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG HAK CIPTA,” LAW REFORM, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 284, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.14710/lr.v13i2.16162.
R. S. S. Turnip, “PENTINGNYA PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP PENGETAHUAN TRADISIONAL DAN EKSPRESI BUDAYA DALAM NEGARA YANG KAYA AKAN BUDAYA,” DHARMASISYA J. Progr. Magister Huk. Fak. Huk. Univ. Indones., vol. 1, no. 4, 2021.
D. P. B. Asri, “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KEBUDAYAAN MELALUI WORLD HERITAGE CENTRE UNESCO,” J. Huk. Ius Quia Iustum, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 256–276, May 2018, doi: 10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss2.art3.
C. Ramadhan, F. Y. D. Siregar, and B. F. Wibowo, BUKU AJAR HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL. Medan: Universitas Medan Area Press, 2023.
M. Rakib, “STRATEGI PENGEMBANGAN EKONOMI KREATIF BERBASIS KEARIFAN LOKAL SEBAGAI PENUNJANG DAYA TARIK WISATA,” J. Kepariwisataan, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 54–69, 2017.
R. S. Astuti, H. Warsono, and A. Rachim, Collaborative Governance dalam Perspektif Administrasi Publik. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro Press, 2020.
A. Wibowo, “Review Sistematik: Elemen-Elemen Utama dalam Membangun Budaya Keselamatan Pasien di Rumah Sakit,” J. Adm. Rumah Sakit Indones., vol. 3, no. 3, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.7454/arsi.v3i3.2227.
D. I. Susanti, R. I. M. Sudhiarsa, and R. Susrijani, EKSPRESI BUDAYA TRADISIONAL DAN HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL. Malang: Kementerian Ristek dan Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi, 2019.
Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, Memperkuat Peradaban Hukum dan Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Jakarta: Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, 2019.
E. V. T. Senewe, “EFEKTIVITAS PENGATURAN HUKUM HAK CIPTA DALAM MELINDUNGI KARYA SENI TRADISIONAL DAERAH,” J. LPPM Bid. EkoSosBudKum, vol. 2, no. 2, 2015.
L. Arizpe Schlosser, “Culture and Conviviability,” 2019, pp. 159–210. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-41602-6_7.
N. Xia, “Intellectual property protection for traditional medical knowledge in China’s context: a round peg in a square hole?,” Med. Law Rev., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 358–390, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad006.
H. M. . Nahak, “UPAYA MELESTARIKAN BUDAYA INDONESIA DI ERA GLOBALISASI,” J. Sosiol. Nusant., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 65–76, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.33369/jsn.5.1.65-76.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.