Keywords
International Arbitration
UNCLOS
Philippines-PRC Relations
Maritime Law
How to Cite
Abstract
The present research scrutinizes the arbitration case between the Philippines and the People's Republic of China concerning the contested maritime zones in the South China Sea, a global hotspot for territorial disputes, rich natural resources, and strategic naval passages. Utilizing a normative legal research methodology coupled with a descriptive-analytical approach, this study carefully examines international legal frameworks, including UNCLOS, and draws upon a diverse range of data sources like legal documents, official statements, and scholarly literature to dissect the nuances of the South China Sea dispute. The findings reveal that the arbitration process, initiated by the Philippines in 2013 and culminating in a 2016 verdict favoring several of its claims, not only holds the promise to fortify international maritime law and foster regional stability but also underscores the critical role of diplomatic efforts in actualizing comprehensive solutions. Nonetheless, the endeavor is not without its pitfalls, notably the absence of stringent sanctions and implementation challenges. Furthermore, the arbitration verdict significantly influences the Philippines-PRC bilateral relations, affecting territorial claims and regional economies, while reaffirming UNCLOS's authority in governing international maritime conflicts. Therefore, the research advocates for sustained diplomatic initiatives and collaboration as a complementary pathway to arbitration, envisioning a harmonious resolution to the complex and multifaceted South China Sea dispute.
Highlights:
-
The arbitration case between the Philippines and the PRC reaffirmed the crucial role of UNCLOS in guiding international maritime disputes and fostering regional stability.
-
Despite the potential to enhance international maritime law and prevent conflicts, the arbitration process faces challenges in terms of enforcing sanctions and ensuring comprehensive implementation.
-
The arbitration verdict has deep-seated implications on Philippines-PRC bilateral relations, impacting territorial claims, economic prospects, and necessitating sustained diplomatic efforts for a more cohesive resolution to the South China Sea dispute.
Keywords: South China Sea, International Arbitration, UNCLOS, Philippines-PRC Relations, Maritime Law.
References
T. Rahma, "Strategi Hedging Filipina di Laut China Selatan Tahun 2017-2019," Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, 2021.
E. R. Itasari and D. G. S. Mangku, “Elaborasi Urgensi dan Konsekuensi atas Kebijakan ASEAN Dalam Memelihara Stabilitas Kawasan di Laut Cina Selatan Secara Kolektif,” J. Harmon., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 143–154, 2020.
A. Ambarwati et al., “Pesona Kekayaan Alam: Sumber Konflik di Kawasan Laut China Selatan,” JULIA J. Litigasi Amsir, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 340–347, 2023.
A. M. Sendow, “Dampak Hukum Konflik Laut Cina Selatan Terhadap Perdagangan Lintas Batas Menurut Hukum Laut Internasional,” Lex Priv., no. 3, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/46868
https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/46868/41828
Z. A. Sikumbang, "Kebijakan ASEAN Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Laut China Selatan Menurut UNCLOS 1982," Medan, Indonesia: Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, 2022.
A. Fatmawati and E. Aprina, “Keabsahan Alasan Penolakan Republik Rakyat Tiongkok Terhadap Putusan Permanent Court Arbitration Atas Sengketa Klaim Wilayah Laut Cina Selatan Antara Philipina dan Republik Rakyat Tiongkok Berdasarkan Hukum Internasional,” Verit. Justitia, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 105–129, Jun. 2019. doi: 10.25123/vej.3289.
P. A. Aneira et al., “Peranan Hukum Internasional Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa,” J. Pendidik. Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 197–205, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPP/article/view/52026
G. H. Tampongangoy, “Arbitrase Merupakan Upaya Hukum Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Dagang Internasioanal,” Lex Soc., vol. III, no. 1, pp. 140–150, 2015.
Z. A. A. Hadju, “Analisis UNCLOS 1982 Terkait Permasalahan Yurisdiksi Negara dan Penegakan Hukum Atas Kapal Berbendera Negara Asing,” SASI, vol. 27, no. 1, p. 12, Mar. 2021. doi: 10.47268/sasi.v27i1.254.
G. Oduntan, “Access to Justice in International Courts for Indigent States, Persons and Peoples,” Indian J. Int. Law, vol. 58, no. 3–4, pp. 265–325, Dec. 2018. doi: 10.1007/s40901-019-00098-5.
A. Yamazaki and S. Osawa, "Asymmetry Theory and China–Philippines Relations with the South China Sea as a Case," East Asia, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 333–352, Dec. 2021. doi: 10.1007/s12140-021-09370-1.
M. Simanjuntak, Konvensi PBB 1982 Tentang Hukum Laut: Makna dan Manfaatnya bagi Bangsa Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia: Mitra Wacana Media, 2018.
B. R. Kaunang, M. G. Nainggolan, and C. D. Massie, “Penegakan Hukum di Wilayah Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Indonesia (Perairan Natuna Utara) sebagai Kawasan Klaim Laut China Selatan,” Lex Adm., vol. X, no. 1, pp. 129–139, 2022. Available: [Online] https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/administratum/article/view/38307/34976
Y. A. Sulistyani, A. C. Pertiwi, and M. I. Sari, “Indonesia's Responses Amidst the Dynamic of the South China Sea Dispute under Jokowi’s Administration,” J. Polit. Din. Masal. Polit. Dalam Negeri dan Hub. Int., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 85–103, May 2021. doi: 10.22212/jp.v12i1.2149.
D. W. S. Adi, “Analysis of Settlement of South China Sea Disputes by the International Arbitration Agency,” J. Huk. Lex Gen., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2021.
N. G. N. G. N. S. Pramesti, “Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase Internasional bagi Perusahaan Multinasional,” J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 01, no. 05, pp. 1–5, 2013. Available: [Online] https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/Kerthanegara/article/view/6097
M. Situmorang, "Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Nasional di Indonesia," J. Penelit. Huk. Jure, vol. 17, no. 4, p. 309, Dec. 2017. doi: 10.30641/dejure.2017.V17.309-320.
A. R. Adhimarif, Analysis of the Rejection by the People's Republic of China of the Permanent Court of Arbitration's Decision on the Philippines' Claim in the South China Sea in 2016, Jakarta, Indonesia: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, 2019.
T. Anggraini, Legal Efforts of the Philippines Regarding China's Unwillingness to Accept the Decision of the International Arbitration Court Related to the South China Sea Dispute between China and the Philippines, Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Universitas Atma Jaya, 2018.
M. A. Baderin, International Human Rights Law & Islamic Law, Jakarta, Indonesia: Mitragrafindo Mandiri, 2010.
L. L. Imon, "Resolution of Maritime Disputes According to the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention," Sci. Lex, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 35–38, 2018.
A. M. Chalid, D. Heryadi, N. Suparman, and A. Sudirman, "ASEAN's Role in Responding to the United States and the Philippines Military Cooperation on the South China Sea Conflict," Intermestic J. Int. Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5–22, 2016. doi: 10.24198/intermestic.v1n1.2.
D. Gede et al., "Journal Pacta Sunt Servanda," vol. 4, no. September, pp. 110–119, 2023.
Miranda and V. Maljak, "The Role of United Nations Convention on the Laws of the Sea in the South China Sea Disputes," E-International Relations, pp. 1–12, 2022.
L. G. C. S. Laksmi, D. G. S. Mangku, and N. P. R. Yuliartini, "Indonesia's Role in the Resolution of International Disputes in the South China Sea," J. Komunitas Yust., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 225–242, Oct. 2022. doi: 10.23887/jatayu.v5i2.51616.
J. deLisle, "Foreign Policy Through Other Means: Hard Power, Soft Power, and China's Turn to Political Warfare to Influence the United States," Orbis, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 174–206, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.orbis.2020.02.004.
T. S. I. Putra, F. X. A. Samekto, and S. Hardiwinoto, "Reclamation of the People's Republic of China's Islands in the South China Sea: An Analysis of Territory Expansion and Its Impact on International Shipping Routes," Diponegoro Law Rev., vol. 5, no. 41, pp. 1–13, 2016. Available: [Online] https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/10960/10629
F. S. Al-Attar, "Indonesia's Stance on the South China Sea Dispute Following the Permanent Court of Arbitration Decision on July 12, 2017," Gema Keadilan, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 143–156, Oct. 2017. doi: 10.14710/gk.2017.3777.
J. Zaucha and K. Gee, Jacek Zaucha Kira Gee, Publisher Unknown, 2019.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.