The Implementation of Age Replacement Method for VH-Drum Components for Baby Diaper Production Machines at PT. XYZ
View Article

Supplementary Files

Similarity Check Result

Keywords

Age Replacement
Komponen Vh – drum
Mesin produksi Popok Bayi

How to Cite

Fauzi, F., & Jakaria, R. B. (2021). The Implementation of Age Replacement Method for VH-Drum Components for Baby Diaper Production Machines at PT. XYZ. Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies, 13, 10.21070/ijins.v13i.526. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijins.v13i.526

Abstract

At PT. XYZ often experiences damage problems during the production process, the high level of damage often causes corrective activities. The high level of corrective activities is caused by replacing components after the component is damaged and this causes high downtime. The average damage to the vh-drum component has a damage frequency of 23 times and a downtime of 3052 minutes in a year. In this study, the aim was to obtain a time interval for replacing sonic seals to reduce maintenance costs by using the age replacement method. Based on the results of the analysis and discussion that has been carried out, it can be concluded that the replacement interval for the Vh-Drum Component of the Baby Diaper Production Machine has decreased with the previous down time of 3052 with the replacement interval for the Vh-Drum Component of the Baby Diaper Production Machine is Baby Diaper is 70,301 days with a total costs IDR 21,735,945, 67 days with a total cost of IDR 22,831,972, 60,883 days with a total cost of IDR 25,018,276. Meanwhile, the smallest cost falls at an interval of 70,301 days with a total cost of Rp. 21,735,945.

https://doi.org/10.21070/ijins.v13i.526
View Article

References

F. Sgarbossa, I. Zennaro, E. Florian, and M. Calzavara, “Age replacement policy in the case of no data: the effect of Weibull parameter estimation,” Int. J. Prod. Res., 2020.

C. Drent, S. Kapodistria, and O. Boxma, “Censored lifetime learning: Optimal Bayesian age-replacement policies,” Oper. Res. Lett., 2020.

F. Safaei, E. Châtelet, and J. Ahmadi, “Optimal age replacement policy for parallel and series systems with dependent components,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 2020.

S. Sanoubar, L. M. Maillart, and O. A. Prokopyev, “Age-replacement policies under age-dependent replacement costs,” IISE Trans., 2021.

S. Eryilmaz and M. H. Pekalp, “On optimal age replacement policy for a class of coherent systems,” J. Comput. Appl. Math., 2020.

F. G. Badía, M. D. Berrade, and H. Lee, “An study of cost effective maintenance policies: Age replacement versus replacement after N minimal repairs,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 2020.

M. Park, K. M. Jung, J. J. Y. Kim, and D. H. Park, “Efficiency consideration of generalized age replacement policy,” Appl. Stoch. Model. Bus. Ind., 2019.

M. Finkelstein, J. H. Cha, and G. Levitin, “On a new age-replacement policy for items with observed stochastic degradation,” Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int., 2020.

C. C. Chang, “Optimal age replacement scheduling for a random work system with random lead time,” Int. J. Prod. Res., 2018.

R. A. Khan, D. Bhattacharyya, and M. Mitra, “A change point estimation problem related to age replacement policies,” Oper. Res. Lett., 2020.

T. Dohi and H. Okamura, “Failure-Correlated Opportunity-based Age Replacement Models,” Int. J. Reliab. Qual. Saf. Eng., 2020.

Y. Iriani and H. Bachtiar, “Analysis of maintenance systems in jet dyeing machine components using the age replacement method,” Univers. J. Mech. Eng., 2019.

Irwan Sukendar, A. Syakhroni, and M. R. Prawira, “Analysis of the Age Replacement Method to Reduce Tool Downtime,” Int. J. Educ. Sci. Technol. Eng., 2020.

I. Emovon and C. O. Mgbemena, “Machinery/service system scheduled replacement time determination: A combine weighted aggregated sum product assessment, additive ratio assessment and age replacement model approach,” Int. J. Integr. Eng., 2018.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...