Login
Section Innovation in Industrial Engineering

Design of Preventive Maintenance Scheduling for Vacuum Feeder Line 4 Machine Using Microsoft Project Based on Pareto Analysis to Reduce Downtime


Perancangan Penjadwalan Preventive Maintenance Mesin Vacuum Feeder Line 4 Menggunakan MS Project Berdasarkan Analisis Pareto Untuk Mengurangi Downtime
Vol. 27 No. 2 (2026): April:

Youngky Odies S (1), Atikha Sidhi Cahyana (2)

(1) Program Studi Teknik Industri, Fakultas Sains dan Teknoligi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
(2) Program Studi Teknik Industri, Fakultas Sains dan Teknoligi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia

Abstract:

General Background Manufacturing continuity in continuous liquid production systems relies heavily on machinery reliability and structured maintenance management. Specific Background PT X faced severe operational disruptions due to high downtime concentrations on the Vacuum Feeder Line 4 machine, reflecting a reactive corrective maintenance approach. Knowledge Gap Although periodic maintenance theories are well established, empirical integration combining Pareto priority analysis, reliability calculations, and software-based scheduling simulations for specific critical liquid-production lines remains limited. Aims This study aims to design a structured preventive maintenance schedule to minimize downtime and improve machine reliability on the Vacuum Feeder Line 4. Results Quantitative analysis of historical downtime data from May 30 to July 1, 2025, revealed a Mean Time Between Failure of 240 hours, a Mean Time To Repair of 345 minutes, and an initial availability of 97.7%, establishing an optimal 8-day preventive maintenance interval that successfully reduced total downtime from 1,036 minutes to 585 minutes (a 43.5% decrease) and increased availability to 98.6%. Novelty This research demonstrates that an 80% Mean Time Between Failure threshold approach integrated with Microsoft Project scheduling effectively transitions reactive maintenance into a proactive reliability-centered strategy. Implications Implementing this structured scheduling framework optimizes plant maintenance resources, reduces unexpected production stoppages, and enhances overall operational efficiency for similar manufacturing facilities.


Key Findings Highlights


Pareto analysis identifies Vacuum Feeder Line 4 as the primary critical contributor, accounting for 52.2% of total production downtime.


Reliability metrics establish a Mean Time Between Failure of 240 hours, setting an optimal preventive maintenance interval of every 8 operating days.


Simulation results indicate a significant 43.5% reduction in total downtime along with an increase in machine availability to 98.6%.


Keywords Downtime, Preventive Maintenance, Pareto Analysis, MTBF, Microsoft Project

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. K. Andika, S. Junus, and E. Larossa, “Sistem Pemeliharaan Preventif Pada Peralatan Utama Stasiun Batching Plant Menggunakan Metode FMEA di PT. Azwa Utama Gorontalo,” JUTIN, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 3284–3289, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.31004/jutin.v8i3.47963.

M. I. Syafei and E. Suhendar, “Perencanaan Perawatan Mesin dengan Pendekatan Metode Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) dan Maintenance Value Stream Map (MVSM) (Studi Kasus: PT. Nusa Indah Jaya),” Integrasi Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri, vol. 7, no. 2, 2022.

Sodikin, C. I. Parwati, F. Fayzi, and M. Indrayana, “Penjadwalan Perawatan Mesin Dengan Metode Preventive Maintenance & Predictive Maintenance (Studi Kasus Di PLTD Kota Masohi),” JUTE, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 37–46, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.59432/jute.v7i1.88.

F. Fahri, B. Harahap, and S. Suliawati, “Analisis Efektivitas Preventive Maintenance dengan Metode Periodic Inspection untuk Meningkatkan Kinerja pada Unit WA800-3,” Blend Sains J. Teknik, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 246–267, May 2025, doi: 10.56211/blendsains.v3i3.799.

Nurholisoh, Ikhsanudin, and Suhardi, “Preventive Maintenance Mesin Cold Saw di PT. Krakatau Baja Konstruksi,” Jurnal Rekayasa Energi dan Mekanika, vol. 5, no. 2, 2026.

Q. Z. M. Arifin and A. Suryadi, “Analisis Prioritas dan Strategi Perawatan Mesin Bubut Menggunakan Metode Failure Mode And Effect Analysis (FMEA) dan Diagram Pareto Di PT XYZ,” Venus, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 200–208, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.61132/venus.v1i5.114.

W. Hartono and D. Handayani, “Pelatihan Penjadwalan Proyek Konstruksi dengan Microsoft Project Pada PT Insan Pesona Kabupaten Pati,” JS, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 61, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.20961/semar.v11i1.53626.

Y. Praharsi, I. K. Sriwana, and D. M. Sari, “Perancangan Penjadwalan Preventive Maintenance Pada PT. Artha Prima Sukses Makmur,” Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri, vol. 14, no. 1, 2022.

V. E. N. H. Paririe, A. D. Rani, D. Anggraeni, and S. A. Rumawak, “Analisis Penjadwalan Proyek dengan Metode Critical Path Method (CPM) Pada Penggantian Ball Mill 10 DIPT Free Port Indonesia,” SLJIL, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 3301–3311, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.46799/syntax-idea.v6i7.4216.

N. F. Fatma, H. Ponda, and R. A. Kuswara, “Analisis Preventive Maintenance Dengan Metode Menghitung Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) Dan Mean Time To Repair (MTTR) (Studi Kasus PT. Gajah Tunggal Tbk),” Heuristic, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 87–94, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.30996/heuristic.v17i2.4648.

Firmansyah, K. Siregar, and T. S. Sinaga, “Analisis Waktu Antar Kerusakan Mesin Electric Motor Menggunakan Metode Failure Finding Interval (Studi Kasus di PT. XYZ),” E-J. Tek. Ind. FT USU, no. 1, 2013.

N. F. Fatma, H. Ponda, and R. A. Kuswara, “Analisis Preventive Maintenance Dengan Metode Menghitung Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) Dan Mean Time To Repair (MTTR) (Studi Kasus PT. Gajah Tunggal Tbk),” Heuristic, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 87–94, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.30996/heuristic.v17i2.4648.

Syaefudin, D. T. Santoso, J. Sumarjo, and R. D. Anjani, “Analisis Keandalan Mesin Menggunakan MTTR dan Downtime untuk Menentukan Mesin Kritis pada Lini Produksi PT X,” J. Tek. Ind., vol. 8, no. 2, 2025.

M. H. Habibi and A. Jibril, “Analisis Perhitungan Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) Dan Mean Time To Repair (MTTR) Mesin Cold Storage,” Proc. Conf., 2025.

K. G. Wohon, A. A. Purba, and B. F. Endrawati, “Penjadwalan Perawatan Sparepart Mesin dengan Pendekatan Reliability Centered Maintenance dan Failure Mode Effect Analysis di PT ABC,” J. Tek. Ind., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 183–188, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.25105/jti.v13i3.19139.

S. Alfionita and F. I. Alifin, “Preventive Maintenance Analysis Based on Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) and Mean Time to Repair (MTTR),” Angkasa, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 201, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.28989/angkasa.v15i2.1833.

S. Silvia, R. I. D. Suyatmo, and M. Murnianti, “Analisis Preventive Maintenance Berdasarkan Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) Dan Mean Time To Repair (MTTR) Pada Alat Blow Molding Di PT XYZ,” J. Pengabdian Masy. Bangsa, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 3471–3478, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.59837/jpmba.v2i8.1495.

M. A. Z. Ramadhan and T. Sukmono, “Penentuan Interval Waktu Preventive Maintenance Pada Nail Making Machine Dengan Menggunakan Metode Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) II,” Prozima, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 49–57, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.21070/prozima.v2i2.1349.

J. Guritno and A. S. Cahyana, “Implementation of Autonomous Maintenance in Total Productive Maintenance,” PELS, vol. 1, no. 2, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.21070/pels.v1i2.914.

C. Amin and I. A. S. Wulandari, “Optimization of City Transport Maintenance and Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) Methods,” J. Tek. Ind., 2022.

UMSIDA, “Pelatihan Penjadwalan Proyek Konstruksi dengan Microsoft Project untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Mahasiswa Teknik Sipil,” JPM, vol. 4, no. 4, 2024.