Keywords
production defects
Failure Mode And Effect Analysis (FMEA)
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
How to Cite
Abstract
UD Fafa Mutiara is a business entity that produces petis as its main product. Products that are considered defective or cannot be repaired and recycled again, will be detrimental to business actors. It is estimated that in each product there are an average of 70 plastic products that are damaged, defective, or even fail, out of 5,000 plastics every month. In a day, Mrs. Ulfa can produce around 175 plastic cases which must be marketed the next day. The purpose of this research is to find out strategies that can improve the quality of UD Fafa Mutiara's petis. One way to find several problems in failure during the petition manufacturing process is known as the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis method, which is abbreviated as FMEA. This method is used to identify potential failures that may occur in the design, production process, or production results. AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) has a meaning as a functional hierarchy with the main input being human presumption, which has many advantages in explaining the decision-making process. The research results obtained were that the highest level of risk in the paste production process was when washing raw materials using dirty water with an RPN value of 448. The strategy of using AHP resulted in suggestions for improvements with the highest value, namely checking water with a value of 0.366. So the recommendation that can be given to UD Fafa Mutiara is to maintain the quality of the water used for washing raw materials.
Highlight :
- Identification of potential failures: FMEA method helps identify possible failures in design and production processes.
- Decision-making process: AHP involves human input to explain decision-making processes effectively.
- Risk mitigation strategy: Maintaining water quality during raw material washing is crucial for improving product quality.
Keywords - Petis; production defects; Failure Mode And Effect Analysis (FMEA); Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
References
S. H. Maria Agustini, Muhajir, “Mekanisasi dalam Pembuatan Petis Kupang di Desa Balong Gabus Kecamatan Candi Kabupaten Sidoarjo.,” Din. J. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 105–111, 2019, doi: 10.31849/dinamisia.v3i1.2729.
M. H. Amiruddin, “Menambah jaringan pemasaran keberbagai daerah di jawa timur.,” JUSTI (Jurnal Sist. Dan Tek. Ind., vol. 1, no. 4, p. 97, 2020.
M. Basjir and Suhartini, “Analisa Risiko Prioritas Perbaikan Kegagalan Proses Penjernihan Air Dengan Metode Fuzzy FMEA Kebutuhan manusia produksinya . Kegagalan adalah suatu kejadian dimana terjadi kondisi,” Tecnoscienza, vol. 03, no. 02, pp. 196–210, 2019.
N. Chandra and E. D. Ratnamurni, “Pengendalian Kualitas Produk Tahu dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP),” INOBIS J. Inov. Bisnis dan Manaj. Indones., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 369–383, 2022, doi: 10.31842/jurnalinobis.v5i3.236.
Y. Hisprastin and I. Musfiroh, “Ishikawa Diagram dan Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA) sebagai Metode yang Sering Digunakan dalam Manajemen Risiko Mutu di Industri,” Maj. Farmasetika, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 1, 2020, doi: 10.24198/mfarmasetika.v6i1.27106.
M. K. U. Andina Mayangsari, Farit Al Fauzi, “Pendampingan Pembuatan dan Pemasaran Petis Sehat Cap Merdeka pada Dasawisma Anggrek di Desa Kilensari Kecamatan Panarukan Kabupaten Situbondo,” J. Pengabdi. UNDIKMA J. Has. Pengabdi. Pemberdaya. Kpd. Masy., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 304–311, 2022.
H. P. I. Misrawi, Neva Satyahadewi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Pembelian Rumah Yuksel dan Dagdeviren ( 2007 ) menjelaskan tahapan-tahapan yang harus dilakukan untuk mengerjakan ANP . Tahapan pertama yaitu konstruksi model dan penyusunan permasalahan . Bentuk permasalahan harus ditentu,” vol. 08, no. 3, pp. 579–588, 2019.
S. Huda, S. Naviah, F. Teknologi, and P. Universitas, “PKM-Mekanisasi Produksi Petis Udang di UD.Murni Sidoarjo,” Penamas Adi Buana, vol. 04, pp. 33–36, 2020.
A. G. Rizaldi and A. S. Cahyana, “Analisa Resiko Postur Kerja Berdasarkan Hasil Evaluasi Menggunakan Metode Quick Exposure Check,” PROZIMA (Productivity, Optim. Manuf. Syst. Eng., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 51–62, 2021, doi: 10.21070/prozima.v5i1.1350.
D. Wahjudi and A. Cahyadi, “Implementasi FMEA untuk Peningkatan Produktifitas di PT. X,” J. Tek. Mesin, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 45–50, 2022, doi: 10.9744/jtm.19.2.45-50.
E. Rizqiah and P. D. Karningsih, “Identifikasi Risiko Supply Chain dengan Mempertimbangkan Kepentingan Stakeholder pada Industri Gula,” PROZIMA (Productivity, Optim. Manuf. Syst. Eng., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 71–81, 2017, doi: 10.21070/prozima.v1i2.1287.
Y. D. Sinabang and A. Bakhtiar, “Analisis Perbaikan Kualitas pada Produk Minuman Sarsaparilla dengan Menggunakan Metode Failure Mode and Effect Analysis ( FMEA ) dan Criticality Index ( Studi Kasus : PT Pabrik Es Siantar ),” Ind. Eng. Online J., vol. 12, pp. 1–9, 2022.
Aniek Sulestiani Titiek Indhira Agustin Moch. Astral Pangestu Reny Wahyuningtyas, WIRAUSAHA KUPANG, no. Mi. 2021.
A. Surahmat and T. D. Fuady, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Koperasi Terbaik Dinas Perdagangan Perindustrian Dan Koperasi Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp) Di Kota Serang,” J. Innov. Futur. Technol., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 67–76, 2022, doi: 10.47080/iftech.v4i1.1745.
R. Viyanti, Sumardianto, and S. Suharto, “Penggunaan Air Pindang Ikan Berbedaterhadap Kandungan Asam Glutamat Pada Petis,” PENA Akuatika, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 23–33, 2019.
B. D. Cahyabuana, “Konsistensi Penggunaan Metode FMEA Terhadap Penilaian Risiko Teknologi Informasi (Studi Kasus : Bank XYZ),” J. Sist. Inf., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 5–11, 2018.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.