Login
Section Innovation in Economics, Finance and Sustainable Development

Instagram and TikTok Promotion Performance for Food MSMEs Using EPIC Model

Kinerja Promosi Instagram dan TikTok bagi UMKM Sektor Pangan Menggunakan Model EPIC
Vol. 27 No. 4 (2026): October:

Aisyah Nur Jannah Putri Hariyono (1), Taufik Setyadi (2), Nisa Hafi Idhoh Fitriana (3)

(1) Program Studi Agribisnis, UPN “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Indonesia
(2) Program Studi Agribisnis, UPN “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Indonesia
(3) Program Studi Agribisnis, UPN “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download

Abstract:

General Background: Social media provides food MSMEs with broad and interactive opportunities for digital promotion. Specific Background: Bumbu Wilona actively uses Instagram and TikTok, generating substantial content exposure, yet high reach, impressions, and views do not necessarily indicate favorable consumer responses or successful marketing communication. Knowledge Gap: Exposure metrics cannot determine whether consumers like promotional content, understand product information, develop purchase interest, or respond positively, while differences between the two platforms require consumer-based evaluation. Aims: This quantitative descriptive study evaluated Instagram and TikTok as promotional media for Bumbu Wilona using the EPIC Model among 120 respondents who had viewed content on both platforms. Results: Instagram recorded scores of 4.18 for Empathy, 4.19 for Persuasion, 4.15 for Impact, and 4.20 for Communication, producing an EPIC Rate of 4.18. TikTok recorded 4.14, 4.14, 4.11, and 4.29, respectively, producing an EPIC Rate of 4.17. Both overall scores were classified as effective, while TikTok Communication was classified as very effective. Novelty: The study evaluates both social media channels using the same four-dimensional consumer-response framework within a food MSME context. Implications: Both channels can be used complementarily, with structured consumer interaction supported through Instagram and broader content reach supported through TikTok.


Highlights:



  • The two platforms recorded overall scores of 4.18 and 4.17.

  • Communication reached 4.20 on one channel and 4.29 on the other.

  • All four-dimensional scores fell within favorable classification ranges.


Keywords: Promotional Effectiveness, Instagram, TikTok, EPIC Model, Food MSMEs

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. M. A. Sifwah, Z. Z. Nikhal, A. P. Dewi, N. Nurcahyani, and R. N. Latifah, “Penerapan Digital Marketing Sebagai Strategi Pemasaran Untuk Meningkatkan Daya Saing UMKM,” MANTAP: Journal of Management Accounting, Tax and Production, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 109–118, 2024, doi: 10.31537/jembe.v1i1.1275.

2. NapoleonCat, “Pengguna Media Sosial di Indonesia,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://napoleoncat.com/stats/social-media-users-in-indonesia/2025/01/

3. M. F. Haikal, E. Stevens, A. S. M. Simanjuntak, and Iskandar, “Pemberdayaan UMKM Skincare Lokal di TikTok Shop: Membangun Kepercayaan dan e-WoM untuk Peningkatan Omset dan Kapasitas Digital,” Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 148–159, 2025, doi: 10.37064/jpm.v13i2.27132.

4. G. G. Wahono, S. D. Handayani, N. M. A. Shafira, M. A. W. Ridho, and F. Rahman, “Strategi Exposur dan Endorsement dalam Digital Marketing untuk Meningkatkan Omset UMKM di Jawa Timur,” Jurnal Investasi Islam, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 829–840, 2025, doi: 10.32806/jii.v6i1.1050.

5. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung, Indonesia: Alfabeta, 2019.

6. J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson, Multivariate Data Analysis, 8th ed. Hampshire, U.K.: Cengage Learning, 2019.

7. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung, Indonesia: CV. Alfabeta, 2016.

8. E. Kurnia, R. Daulay, and N. Aisha, “Analisis Efektivitas Promosi Media Sosial dengan Menggunakan Metode EPIC Model dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Produk di Kota Medan,” Balance: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Manajemen, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 273–281, 2022, doi: 10.59086/jam.v1i2.139.

9. R. N. Amalia, R. S. Dianingati, and E. Annisaa, “Pengaruh Jumlah Responden terhadap Hasil Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Kuesioner Pengetahuan dan Perilaku Swamedikasi,” Journal of Research in Pharmacy, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 9–15, 2022, doi: 10.14710/genres.v2i1.12271.

10. A. Zayrin, H. Nupus, K. K. Maizia, and S. Marsela, “Analisis Instrumen Penelitian Pendidikan (Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian),” QOSIM: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial & Humaniora, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 780–789, 2025, doi: 10.61104/jq.v3i2.1070.

11. D. Durianto, Sugiarto, A. W. Widjaja, and Supratikno, Invasi Pasar dengan Iklan yang Efektif. Jakarta, Indonesia: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2003.

12. Feriyati and I. F. Deslia, “Strategi Digital Marketing Communication Maestro Parfum dalam Meningkatkan Minat Beli Konsumen,” Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 23–32, 2024, doi: 10.31602/jm.v7i1.14352.

13. P. Kotler and K. L. Keller, Marketing Management, 14th ed. Harlow, U.K.: Pearson Education, 2012.

14. V. Senjaliani and H. L. Suwarno, “Peran Penggunaan Media Sosial terhadap Loyalitas Pelanggan Dimediasi Kepercayaan Pelanggan dan Kualitas Informasi,” Jurnal Manajemen, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 158–183, 2024, doi: 10.25170/jm.v21i2.5563.

15. E. Sando and A. Valentina, “Analisis Gaya Konten Video pada Reels Instagram terhadap Keterlibatan dan Pengalaman Audiens,” Jurnal Serina Sosial Humaniora, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 241–247, 2023, doi: 10.24912/jssh.v1i3.28537.

16. B. Pribadi and M. N. Darajat, “Adaptasi Digital dan Persepsi Konsumen pada UMKM: Kajian Kualitatif,” Indonesian Journal of Digital Business, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 3153–3160, 2026, doi: 10.17509/ijdb.v5i4.99875.