Login
Section Innovation in Education

School Website Development for Parental Information Access

Pengembangan Website Sekolah untuk Akses Informasi Orang Tua
Vol. 27 No. 1 (2026): January:

Ayu Faza Fauziyyah (1), Wahyudin (2), Ayu Puji Rahayu (3)

(1) Institut Pendidikan Indonesia Garut, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
(3) Institut Pendidikan Indonesia Garut, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download

Abstract:

General Background: The rapid advancement of information technology has reshaped information management and communication practices within educational institutions, including primary schools. Specific Background: At SDIT Persis 99 Rancabango, school information for parents has been disseminated through fragmented and conventional channels, resulting in unstructured data and limited traceability. Knowledge Gap: Previous studies predominantly positioned school websites as promotional or one-way communication tools, leaving limited empirical evidence on their role as centralized information systems tailored to sustained parental access. Aims: This study aimed to develop a school information system based on a website using Google Sites to provide structured, integrated, and continuously accessible information for parents. Results: Using the ADDIE development model, the website was validated by media and content experts with feasibility scores exceeding 90%, received highly positive parental responses, and demonstrated a statistically significant increase in parental information access based on pretest–posttest analysis. Novelty: This study positions Google Sites as a practical platform for developing a centralized school information system specifically oriented toward parental information needs in primary education contexts. Implications: The findings provide empirical and practical contributions for elementary schools with limited resources in adopting centralized, user-friendly digital information services to support transparent and structured school–parent communication.


Highlights

• Centralized School Information Reduced Fragmented Communication Channels
• Google Sites Supported Structured Parental Information Access
• ADDIE-Based Development Achieved High Expert Validation Scores


Keywords

School Information System; School Website; Google Sites; Parental Information Access; ADDIE Model

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. M. Mohammadyari and H. Singh, “Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy,” Computers & Education, vol. 117, pp. 1–14, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.005.

M. Al-Fraihat, M. Joy, R. Masa’deh, and J. Sinclair, “Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 102, pp. 67–86, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004.

A. Tella, “Examining the impact of ICT on parental involvement in schools,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 21, pp. 1637–1650, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10639-015-9392-7.

M. S. Islam and S. Grönlund, “An international literature review of 1:1 computing in schools,” Journal of Educational Change, vol. 17, pp. 191–222, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10833-016-9271-y.

A. Q. Gill, A. Henderson-Sellers, and T. F. Boyle, “Information system development: A systems thinking perspective,” Systems Research and Behavioral Science, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 471–493, 2016, doi: 10.1002/sres.2350.

A. Martin, “Digital literacy and the ‘digital society’,” Journal of Documentation, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 375–394, 2010, doi: 10.1108/00220411011052106.

C. T. Tan, C. Ong, and J. Ramachandran, “Examining the use of school websites for home–school communication,” Computers & Education, vol. 143, 103671, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103671.

S. Baytak and M. Tarman, “Technology integration in education: Using Google Sites for educational purposes,” TOJET, 2011, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4939.5044.

B. P. R. Kumar, “Design and development of a web-based information system using Google Sites,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 215–222, 2020, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2020.0110527.

M. C. Yuen and L. L. Ma, “Parental involvement in digital learning: Access to school information,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 28, pp. 345–362, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11246-5.

R. M. Branch, Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. Springer, 2009, doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6.

J. Nielsen, “Usability inspection methods,” CHI ’94 Conference Companion, pp. 413–414, 1994, doi: 10.1145/259963.260531.

J. W. Creswell and J. Creswell, Research Design, 5th ed. SAGE, 2017, doi: 10.5539/ies.v8n1p42.

S. DeLone and E. McLean, “The DeLone and McLean Model of information systems success,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 9–30, 2003, doi: 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748.

S. Y. Park, “An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning,” Educational Technology & Society, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 150–162, 2009, doi: 10.2307/jeductechsoci.12.3.150.

F. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 319, 1989, doi: 10.2307/249008.

T. Teo, “Modelling technology acceptance in education,” Computers & Education, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 302–312, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006.

D. Gefen and D. Straub, “Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 389–400, 1997, doi: 10.2307/249720.

I. Ajzen, “The theory of planned behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 50, pp. 179–211, 1991, doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.

A. Parasuraman, V. Zeithaml, and L. Berry, “Servqual: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality,” Journal of Retailing, vol. 64, 1988, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24184-2_14.

S. McMillan and J. Morrison, “Coming of age with the internet,” New Media & Society, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 73–95, 2006, doi: 10.1177/1461444806059871.

E. Turban, Information Technology for Management. Wiley, 2018, doi: 10.1002/9781119524656.

T. Connolly and C. Stansfield, “Using web-based information to enhance parental engagement,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 69–79, 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00523.x.

S. O. Alharbi and S. Drew, “Using the technology acceptance model in understanding academics’ behavioural intention to use learning management systems,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 5, no. 1, 2014, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2014.050120.

H. Mohamad and F. Tasir, “Web-based learning environment and its usability evaluation,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 46, pp. 1579–1583, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.341.

P. Zhang and N. Li, “The importance of usability in web-based learning systems,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 73–78, 2003, doi: 10.1145/903893.903896.

A. Almarashdeh, “The success of learning management system among distance learners,” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, vol. 52, no. 3, 2013, doi: 10.2514/6.2013-2871.

A. Mtebe and J. Raisamo, “Investigating students’ behavioural intention to adopt and use mobile learning in higher education in East Africa,” International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, vol. 10, no. 3, 2014, doi: 10.5430/ijhe.v4n4p105.