Yosep Fredi (1), I Made Tegeh (2), Ketut Agustini (3)
General Background: Creative thinking is a core competence in twenty-first-century education, particularly for lower secondary students navigating intensive digital learning environments. Specific Background: The widespread integration of smartphones in Cambridge-curriculum schools positions digital technology, learner autonomy, parental control, and social context as interrelated factors in students’ creative development. Knowledge Gap: Empirical evidence remains limited regarding how these factors are structurally related and how social context operates as a moderator within digitally mediated learning settings. Aims: This study aims to examine the relationships between smartphone use, parental control, and learner autonomy on students’ creative thinking skills, as well as the moderating role of the social environment. Results: Using an ex-post facto quantitative design and PLS-SEM analysis of data from 67 lower secondary students, the findings show that smartphone use and learner autonomy are positively associated with creative thinking, while parental control shows no significant relationship. The social environment does not moderate the relationships involving smartphone use or parental control, but it negatively moderates the relationship between learner autonomy and creative thinking. Novelty: The study reveals the selective moderating function of the social environment, demonstrating that strong social support may reduce the expression of creativity driven by learner autonomy. Implications: These findings underscore the need for balanced educational strategies that integrate digital technology, self-regulated learning, and calibrated social support to foster creative thinking in secondary education contexts.
• Smartphone use is positively associated with students’ creative thinking skills• Learner autonomy shows a significant positive relationship with creative thinking• Social environment weakens the autonomy–creativity relationship under strong support conditions
Smartphone Use; Learner Autonomy; Creative Thinking Skills; Parental Control; Social Environment
Kepala Lembaga Penjaminan Mutu dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Singaraja.
Ketut Agustini was born on August 1st, 1974, in Singaraja, Bali, Indonesia. She received her bachelor degree in Mathematics from Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia, in 1998; her master degree in Computer Science from Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia, in 2006; and her doctoral degree in Education Technology from Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia, in 2014. Recently, she is a lecturer at Informatics Engineering Education Department, Undergraduate Program, and also Vice Head of Instructional Technology Department, Graduate Program, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali, Indonesia.
S. Livingstone, G. Mascheroni, and E. Staksrud, “European research on children’s internet use: Assessing the past and anticipating the future,” New Media & Society, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1103–1122, 2018, doi: 10.1177/1461444816685930.
A. Lepp, J. E. Barkley, and A. C. Karpinski, “The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety, and satisfaction with life in college students,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 31, pp. 343–350, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.049.
C. Wang, M. K. Lee, and C. Hua, “The impact of smartphone use on student learning behavior and performance: A systematic review,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 1459–1482, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11423-021-09973-x.
C. Tan, S. Lim, and P. Wong, “Smartphones and student creativity: A double-edged sword,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 233–250, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10506-4.
B. A. Hennessey and T. M. Amabile, “Creativity,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 61, pp. 569–598, 2010, doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416.
M. A. Runco and G. J. Jaeger, “The standard definition of creativity,” Creativity Research Journal, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 92–96, 2012, doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.650092.
U. Bronfenbrenner, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press, 1978.
S. S. Aljomaa, M. F. A. Qudah, I. S. Albursan, S. F. Bakhiet, and A. S. Abduljabbar, “Smartphone addiction among university students in the light of some variables,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 61, pp. 155–164, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.041.
A. Craft, Creativity in Schools: Tensions and Dilemmas. London, UK: Routledge, 2005.
T. M. Amabile, Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. Boulder, CO, USA: Westview Press, 1996.
E. Panadero, “A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 8, p. 422, 2017, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422.
B. J. Zimmerman, “Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 82–91, 2000, doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1016.
S. T. Hidayatuladkia, M. Kanzunnudin, and S. D. Ardianti, “Peran orang tua dalam mengontrol penggunaan gadget pada anak usia 11 tahun,” Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 363–372, 2021.
S. J. Lee and Y. G. Chae, “Balancing between regulation and autonomy: Parental mediation of children’s smartphone use,” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 362–368, 2017, doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0663.
N. L. G. M. Widiastiti and G. N. S. Agustika, “Intensitas penggunaan gadget oleh anak usia dini ditinjau dari pola asuh orang tua di Kabupaten Badung,” Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Undiksha, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 112–120, 2020, doi: 10.23887/jpaud.v8i2.26506.
R. A. Beghetto and J. C. Kaufman, “Classroom contexts for creativity,” High Ability Studies, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 53–69, 2014, doi: 10.1080/13598139.2014.905247.
D. Davies, D. Jindal-Snape, C. Collier, R. Digby, P. Hay, and A. Howe, “Creative learning environments in education—A systematic literature review,” Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol. 8, pp. 80–91, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2012.07.004.
Y. Gao, X. Zhang, and L. Chen, “Social support and creativity in adolescents: The moderating role of digital engagement,” Journal of Youth Studies, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 450–465, 2024.
J. F. Hair, G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage, 2021.
W. W. Chin, “The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling,” in Modern Methods for Business Research, G. A. Marcoulides, Ed. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998, pp. 295–336.
P. R. Pintrich, “A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 385–407, 2004, doi: 10.1023/B:EDPR.0000032312.77073.39.