Abstract:
General Background: Agenda setting is a vital phase in public policy development, determining which public issues are prioritized. Specific Background: The Kampung KORPRI program in Yogyakarta, initiated by the Dewan Pengurus KORPRI Kota Yogyakarta, represents a thematic social service activity in Karangkajen, not as a residential area for KORPRI members but as a locus for community service. Knowledge Gap: Despite its significance, there is limited research on how agenda setting shapes public service programs initiated by civil servant organizations without political motives. Aims: This study aims to analyze the agenda setting process in the formation of the Kampung KORPRI program through planning and formulation stages. Results: Using a descriptive qualitative method with an explorative approach, supported by in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation, findings show that planning was conducted by each involved unit based on specific activity targets, while formulation involved detailed design and confirmation of implementation. Novelty: The program is confirmed to be free from political agendas, evidenced by the absence of KORPRI members in the 2024 local elections. Implications: This research highlights the potential of neutral, community-oriented civil servant initiatives and emphasizes the importance of structured agenda setting in realizing sustainable public service programs.
Highlights:
- Non-political civil servant program for community service.
- Focus on planning and formulation stages.
- Structured agenda setting ensures policy effectiveness.
Keywords: Agenda Setting, Public Policy, Kampung KORPRI, Community Service, Yogyakarta
References
[1] Z. Abdussamad, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Makassar: Syakir Media Press, 2021.
[2] C. Amin and L. M. F. Purwanto, “Peran Tasripin Pada Perkembangan Kampung Kota,” Jurnal Arsitektur, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 25–37, 2021.
[3] P. Astomo, “Penerapan Prinsip-Prinsip Pemerintahan yang Baik dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan,” Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, vol. 64, no. 16, pp. 401–420, 2014.
[4] D. Gupta et al., Toponim Kota Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Dinas Pariwisata, Seni, dan Budaya, 2007.
[5] E. Efendi et al., “Teori Agenda Setting,” Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1715–1718, 2023.
[6] N. Fatimah et al., Kajian Digitalisasi Infrastruktur Pewarta Program Kampung Sains Karangkajen (PEPAK) untuk Penguatan Kampung Wisata Cerdas Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, 2023.
[7] H. Hardani et al., Metode Penelitian Kualitatif & Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: CV Pustaka Ilmu Group, 2020.
[8] K. Mukhlis, “Peran Religiusitas dan Dukungan Sosial terhadap Subjective Well-Being pada Remaja,” Jurnal Psikologi Islam, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 85–96, 2019.
[9] Rahmadi, Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian. Banjarmasin: Antasari Press, 2011.
[10] S. H. Sahir, Metodologi Penelitian. Bantul: KBM Indonesia, 2022.
[11] S. Ibnu, Metodologi Penelitian. Bandung: Widina Bhakti Persada Bandung, 2022.
[12] L. Sugiarsih et al., “Peningkatan Kemampuan Anak dalam Bereksplorasi Melalui Metode Eksperimen Kelompok B TK Alif Jombang,” Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 173–180, 2021.
[13] S. Muhammad et al., “Konsep Organisasi dan Pengorganisasian dalam Perwujudan Kepentingan Manusia,” Jurnal Administrasi dan Organisasi, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 95–103, 2022.
[14] M. Wahib, Kehidupan Keagamaan di Keraton Yogyakarta pada Masa HB IX. Skripsi, UIN Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta, 2001.
[15] W. Yuliani, “Metode Penelitian Deskriptif Kualitatif dalam Perspektif Bimbingan dan Konseling,” Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 83–91, 2018.